The Concept

Developmental Coordination Disorder (DCD) is a problem that affects 5-8% of school age children.  The diagnosis for the condition is primarily based around poor movement control that impacts an individual’s daily routine but is unattributed to other neurological or behavioral problems.  DCD is a heterogeneous disorder that has a high rate of coexistence with other problems such as ADHD, Dyslexia and Autism.  Individuals diagnosed with DCD generally suffer from poor motor control throughout childhood and adolescence, with physiotherapy based interventions showing limited success in reducing symptoms.

Due to the nature of the disorder which disrupts important fine and gross motor skills, children suffering from DCD and movement coordination deficits commonly withdraw from activities that require these skills such as playground play, sports and playing musical instruments.  As a result, research has found a common association between DCD and the performance of ‘Fundamental Movement Skills’ with other physical and mental health problems such as obesity, coronary heart disease, social withdrawal, low self efficacy and lack of cardiovascular fitness compared with ‘typically developing’ children.  There is plenty of evidence to support this relationship and the hugely negative impact these factors have on children with movement problems right through adolescence and into adulthood (See papers by Bartlett et al., 2008a; 2008b; 2009).

Despite the quantity of research in this area, the aetiology of DCD remains unclear.  Theories suggest that there are disruptions in the kinematic control of DCD sufferers which means they are inaccurate in the temporal and spatial aspects of motor skills.  For example when catching a ball, a child with DCD is likely to have slower or more inconsistent (jerky) motor responses and may be unable to get the correct positioning of their fingers, hands and body in relation to the trajectory of the ball.  This will in all likelihood cause the child to be unsuccessful in catching a ball.  However in my opinion it is not likely that DCD simply causes an inability to move and grasp the ball.  In a task such as catching, visual perception is vital to be able to judge the timing and position of the ball’s trajectory before the movement is even initiated.  Continuing with the catching example; if a child’s visual perception of the ball’s trajectory is inaccurate or inefficient compared to a typically developing child, it stands to reason their accuracy of movement will be affected.

Research of visual perception and the effect of efficient eye movements and gaze behavior in the performance of motor skills have been extensively researched in the field of sport and Health Sciences.  Studies have shown expert performers have significantly more ‘efficient’ eye movements in the preparation and execution of sports skills such as golf putting; basketball free throws; football penalty taking utilizing a smaller number of fixations for a longer duration, enabling them to gather more in depth visual information from only relevant visual sources.

One particular gaze behavior, known as the quiet eye (QE), has consistently provided a distinction between expert performers over novices and successful performances over unsuccessful performances in various sports. The quiet eye is defined as the “final fixation or tracking gaze that is located on a specific location or object within the visuomotor workspace within 3° of visual angle (or less) for a minimum of 100 ms” (Vickers, 2007, p.11).  Research indicates that an earlier onset and longer QE duration may significantly improve performance.

More recently QE training studies have produced encouraging results in sport skills but also in training skills such as laparoscopic surgery.  This research is demonstrating that implicit learning of gaze behaviour is an effective tool for the retention of motor skills, but also for maintaining performance under pressure tests.  Studies are showing that skills that are learnt implicitly through gaze behavior are reproduced more effectively and accurately under pressure particularly compared to skills that are learnt through technical instruction.

The implications of these findings for children with DCD and other movement problems are very exciting.  If novices can be taught to putt like pros and medical students to master the fine motor skills involved in laparoscopic surgery in a just a week of gaze training, than maybe we can use these effective teaching mechanisms to get children with DCD to overcome deficits in visuomotor perception to improve their performance of skills such as throwing, catching, balancing and hitting.  Even a small improvement in these sorts of skills may have a huge impact on their perceptions of physical activity, playground games and participation in sports.

2 thoughts on “The Concept

  1. charlotte…in the brief on motor control, and various researches in the fields of conditions such as dyspraxia, research has involved looking at eye movements and eye coordinations etc and then coping strategies worked to help cope with these…
    i havent seen info on research done to look at how NATURAL LIGHT entering the eye in the first place as a ROOT CAUSE to the various problems such as dyspraxia…
    I believe NATURAL LIGHT is a major player that is upsetting the balance in the brains processing centre..in particular a certain specific colour wavelength of light specific to that individual….
    I am a dispensing optician based in Hinckley Leicestershire and have a interest in area of dyslexia ,dyspraxia Aspergers and Autism…
    I have had children come to me with dyspraxia or poor motor coordination ,cannot catch a ball, their hand eye movement uncoordinated in trying to catch a ball is very poor,,, trying to hit a target with a ball at a distance cosistantly very difficult..usual attributes associated with dyspraxia…
    with that specific particular frequency of colour light being blocked out ,i found that the motor control improved immensly, the hand eye coordination in catching a ball improved tremendously , the throwing of ball was harder and faster and the individuals balance much better..
    I would clearly love to expand the work I do , which is my passion ,as it has opened many avenues , which gives credence to my theory that NATURAL LIGHT IS A MAJOR PLAYER in the processing of info by the brain .
    .and this not just in areas of dyspraxia , but speech , short term memory , aspergers and autism,,,
    this all needs quantitative analysis..documentation ,peer review…to back me up , and this is something i dont have acces to at the moment ..
    I look forward to your comments , and reply…
    many thanks
    zahir ibrahim

    • Zahir,
      I agree that little research appears to be concerned with the effect of natural light on the impairments of children with dyspraxia. This is certainly an interesting avenue that sounds very worth pursuing. I would be interested to learn more about your theories and findings, perhaps you could drop me an email? (milesc@hope.ac.uk)

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s